26 July 2016

Why do People Believe that the System is Rigged? Because it is!!

So, Donald and Bernie have made a lot of statements about the system being rigged.  Rigged generally towards wealthy people who maintain and increase their wealth. And, rigged politically for those already in power or the wealthy (see above) to control the politicians and the political process.  Just by watching the publicly known activities of the rigged-system's beneficiaries such as campaign finance and lobbying - legal, but better stated as legalized corruption - one should conclude that the system is set up only for a relatively few.  However, unless you are part of the system, mere mortals don't normally get to see the inner workings of that system reflecting exactly how rigged the system really is.  The recent release by WikiLeaks of the Democratic National Committee's emails clearly reflect the elites' coordinated effort to kill off Bernie's campaign for the presidency, but - and even more worrisome - it highlighted the systematic and unabashed effort to sell access to the president and others to donors.  In one sense it is laughable that so many people think that by giving $10,000 or even a $100,000 they are actually being listened to by the party's policy makers; that requires millions that are given by only a few - and they really only want access for business reasons, not to have an effect on policy.  A great example of such ignorance are the fake policy dinners and other events that are held by the political parties to invite such donors to "contribute" to the party's and the government's policy-making process.  I can't imagine people so naive to think that their input at such events matters yet apparently smart enough have made to make the money to begin that they donated in order to be invited to such events.  In any event, now that Bernie's voice is being eliminated from the public space this week through the Democratic Party's Convention and the official nomination of Hillary Clinton, only Donald Trump will be carrying forward the "rigged system" argument.  And, for him, the disclosure of how both parties raise money and rig the system is a gift that will keep on giving because he will be able to use it against Hillary and the Democrats and yet be immune from blowback on him because he was never a beneficiary of such a system on the Republican side (which works in exactly the same way as it does for the Democrats).  If all this resonates with his and Bernie's supporters, I suspect Trump has a very good chance to be the next president.

As a related aside, the WikiLeaks disclosures bring back what I heard Kim Dotcom state last year in an interview on Bloomberg TV about the extradition case against him in New Zealand (the U.S. has requested that New Zealand send Kim Dotcom to the U.S. to stand trial for copyright infringement and other crimes relating to his file-sharing website called MegaUpload).  He said that Julian Assange (the WikiLeaks founder) was going to release so much information about Hillary that she'll likely have to withdraw from the presidential race.  That statement was made before the date of the earliest emails recently released. So, that could mean that WikiLeaks has a lot more (older and more damaging) information to release about Hillary, which could mean even more damage to her campaign and an even greater chance that Trump wins the presidency.

1 comment:

  1. My contrarian impulses are trying to push me in the direction of wondering if rich vs. poor, and its consistent results, didn't exist prior to any system being established which could be rigged. But screw that, there's a Clinton to be had!

    Nice point about the timeline - all these leaks are about events which occurred after Clinton's private server is revealed. No one really questions that she was hacked and 'they' have info [pre-FBI dump] which can do great damage. From the hackers perspective, why release it early? Instead, watch her squirm in public, go on the record with FBI and be nominated.

    ReplyDelete